cool, had not known of graduated strength hall sensor being used this way
sounds like a cool trick of programming they pulled off !
thinking it through, it seems the placement of magnets
and relative strength of those magnets needs to be quite precise
note to note, as there must be a threshold point of "strength"
as the reading ramps up that actually triggers the note on message..
so they are basically noting the fluctuation as soon as it begins
and relatively compute an appropriate value/values up to the trigger,
and since this is a variable, for the keyboard to be "level" in feeling,
the physical precision must be there right off the bat
this should be more sensitive than the dual trace top-hat or dual switch system,
as there is only the (time factor) between first and second contact for those,
and the note cannot voice "on" until second contact is reached. This
is what annoys me about most keyboards, that even if you switch to
a sound, like organ, that needs no velocity, it still does not "trigger"
until the second contact in the vast majority of designs
i would also think that with the increased data of a graduated fluctuation
from the magnetic field, they can also lower the physical point for the
threshold trigger.. in other words, you have to push down a key quite a way
to trigger a note in a dual contact system, and this varies somewhat from
brand to brand and keyboard design, and sometimes that "depth" of
touch needed is a bit unnatural compared to the acoustic instrument, while on
the Limex system, the computing power of the CPU and it's potential
speed and accuracy for interpreting the fluctuation data is the factor
that sets the physical key depth "spot"
this would represent a true advancement, and i would like to
have a look at this on my workbench.
guess i need to contact LIMEX and learn more
i wonder at which point in time CPU power allowed them to
convert to this system